One of the things I tell students to do like Chicagoans vote — early and often — is to Google themselves. You need to know what’s out there about you so you can control the public presentation of yourself when it’s time to look for a job. I demand students clean up their online acts well before potential employers may be lurking around as faux Facebook friends looking for reasons to dump half the stack of resumes they’ve got. I Googled myself and found this YouTube clip. It’s raw footage from an interview I did with some of my Oregon State University students on the impact of new media on the election of President Obama:


Twitter is SO last week!

Flutter is the new Twitter!!

This non-stop news cycle, fueled by new media technology and socially- mediated students, offers a real-time, textbook example

of, well, a socially mediated, content aggregated,new media mediated news story. All elements present and accounted for:

a) a real-live newsworthy subject

b) dramatic fight for injustice (real or perceived, depends on your perspective)

c) Youth vs. the, um, Unyouth; David vs. Goliath; Us vs. The Man; Good vs. Evil

d) constantly updated content via all popular new media content vehicles, Twitter, streaming interviews, Facebook, blogging, all related stories linked on blog and Facebook page for easy access; BOTH sides providing blogs (in fact, both blogs linking to each other!! in a really cool, meta-mediated-move)

e) content is immediate; tone is both professional and personal (updates include logistical details as well as first-person accounts of student experiences and perceptions)

f) commenters going kerfloohey

g) high degree of potential for going viral especially if strikers start posting YouTube videos….

Streaming news story with editors interviewed:

Ashley Chase and Robert D’Andrea on KWVA in T minus 14

March 5, 2009 by independentjournalist

Our editor-in-chief, managing editor and senior news editor are going to be speaking about our situation on KWVA. You can stream it at this address. You’ll need RealPlayer. Enjoy.

Oregon Public Radio story:

Daily Emerald Staff Revolts

The Daily Emerald’s newsroom is protesting how its board is implementing a new strategic plan. Staff at the University of Oregon’s daily newspaper went on strike Wednesday. Rob Manning reports.

The staff argues it would reduce the paper’s independence. The Emerald is separate from the University of Oregon, but it reports on U of O extensively.

Student managing editor, Allie Grasgreen, says the board had offered to hire a new publisher, who could’ve also been employed by U of O.

Grasgreen says currently students decide whether to report on their journalism professors, for instance.

From Oregon Media Insiders:

The entire Oregon Daily Emerald staff walked out at 6 this morning in a dispute with its board of directors over student control and editorial independence:

The [four] demands address recent hiring decisions of the board that are far out of line with the Emerald’s guiding values and ethics. The Emerald is in the midst of a transformation that we hope will allow us to continue to publish as long as the University is enrolling students, but we are in dire financial straits and if these changes are not made soon, the Emerald may have to close its doors within the next few years.

Blog post from the Oregon Daily Emerald staff strike blog:

How can you help?

March 5, 2009 by independentjournalist

A student in the cafe in which we are currently based asked me this question and I thought it was pretty apt:
“What can we do to help?” So I felt like I ought to let you know.

The most important part, I think, will be to let people know you care, especially the ASUO (student government) and members of the board. The ASUO is important because it pays our subscription fee, which pays for us to put our paper on campus. ASUO President Sam Dotters-Katz’s letter makes clear that he and his office support us in no equivocal terms. But it is also important to ensure that officers in student government know that their constituents support their decisions. The best way is to send e-mails to the Senate, the Athletics and Contracts Finance Committee, and Dotters-Katz himself.

Chronicle of Higher Education covers it:
Calling all academics: Job Tips for Surviving the Recession
1. Do not steal a bicycle in front of a security camera if the footage is going to end up on YouTube.
2. Pretty much that one.
(From The Chronicle of Higher Education)
A student sent me this YouTube video his pal made in response to the Facebook Fiasco.  Is everything turned upside down again?

I’m a sucker for a New Media guy with an old guitar, crooning on YouTube about Twitter:


Here’s an interesting take on how the Clintons missed the New Media machine and couldn’t get their message out. It’s written by Joe Garofoli, a terrific Old School journalist I went to college with. He’s all about New Media now. I’m going to shoot him a note and see how this happened. He stayed in reporting during the time I’ve been teaching. I’m eager to hear from him about his experiences in the news trenches.

San Francisco Chronicle online:

Friday, June 6, 2008 (SF Chronicle)
How new media affected Clinton campaign
Joe Garofoli, Chronicle Staff Writer  
 The rise and fall of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign can be
traced through video – from her first announcement to the apparent
suspension of the campaign. Some of the video was scripted fare, much of
it wasn’t. Some of it aired on network TV, much of it spread virally
   And each of the videos was viewed enough to dominate the news for at least
a day. Collectively, they helped shape the narrative of her campaign.
   What hurt Clinton most, political analysts say, is that she couldn’t
consistently use the newfound ubiquity of video to soften her image with
voters. Or, as George Washington University Professor and new-media
analyst Michael Cornfeld said, “It’s like the Clintons, both of them, had
sort of a ‘Sunset Boulevard’ thing going on. They were silent screen stars
who couldn’t make the transition to talkies.”